This is a lab observation designed to measure the quality of attachment and the differences in attachment styles in infants.
Ainsworth wanted to measure attachment styles in a controlled way and so devised a technique known as 'The Strange Situation.
In 1970 Ainsworth and Bell observed 100 middle-class infants from a US University nursery.
A standardised room was used containing chairs, toys and a one-way mirror so the psychologists could film and observe without being seen
The room was standardised in that the furniture and toys were always in the same place and all participants had exactly the same layout
Only mothers were used as the Primary Care Giver (PCG) in this version
The mother and infant are left to play and the child is encouraged to explore
The stranger enters the room and attempts to interact with the infant
The mother leaves whilst the stranger is in the room
The mother returns and the stranger leaves
The mother leaves
The stranger returns
The mother returns and the stranger leaves
Ainsworth was looking for 4 things:
How willing the infant was to explore the room?
How the infant reacted to the stranger?
How the infant reacted to being left?
How the infant reacted upon reunion with the mother?
All of these behaviours could be observed on several occasions
Ainsworth had three classifications for the infants she observed:
Type B Secure 70% of infants were classified as Secure
Type A Insecure Avoidant 15% of infants were classified as Insecure Avoidant
Type C Insecure Resistant 15% of infants were classified as Insecure Resistant
Ainsworth concluded that the mother's behaviour toward her infant will predict attachment type
She called this the Caregiver Sensitivity Hypothesis
The fact that the majority of infants in her study were securely attached seemed to support this hypothesis
The positives of the strange situation
It is very reliable as it is very easy to repeat: Especially as everything is standardised
There is also inter-rater reliability as more than one observer was used and the experiment was filmed
Further evidence for reliability comes from other research that has found that the categories used to observe the infants also work and the classifications for attachment are also reliable
Independent observers come to the same classifications of attachment as the original observers in a study completed by Waters (1978)
The negatives of the strange situation
The population validity is low as it was a relatively small sample and all the participants came from similar socio-economic and geographical backgrounds
This means it cannot be generalised
It lacks ecological validity: It does not represent tasks completed by caregivers-infants in real life
However, Ainsworth was aware of this: She calls the study 'Strange'
She had to sacrifice ecological validity for the control of a lab observation
Is the Strange Situation valid in other cultures?
Ainsworth is judging children by Western standards and this may not be applicable to other cultures where child-rearing practices are different i.e. Japan
What if the mother was not the PCG?
A large assumption was made here as the infant may have had different attachment styles with the multiple attachments they probably already had
Other attachment figures were ignored
Practice explaining The Strange Situation for a range of question lengths in your revision. You don't need to list the entire study but need a precis or snapshot of it. The detail you need may vary dependent on the question: A six marker asking you to outline the study will need more depth than the AO1 for an 8 or even 16 marker. If they ask you for an Ainsworth study: Use a strange situation. The exam is not the time to try to be extra clever and discuss her work in Uganda. Unless you have read outside the specification, you will not have enough detail. Every time this question comes up, some candidates will try to talk about their African Studies but it always results in lower marks as the detail is not there.
转载自savemyexams
© 2024. All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备2023009024号-1