2020 AIME I真题及答案
参考答案见文末(仅供参考)
Problem 1
In with
point
lies strictly between
and
on side
and point
lies strictly between
and
on side
such that
The degree measure of
is
where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
Problem 2
There is a unique positive real number such that the three numbers
,
, and
, in that order, form a geometric progression with positive common ratio. The number
can be written as
, where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
.
Problem 3
A positive integer has base-eleven representation
and base-eight representation
where
and
represent (not necessarily distinct) digits. Find the least such
expressed in base ten.
Problem 4
Let be the set of positive integers
with the property that the last four digits of
are
and when the last four digits are removed, the result is a divisor of
For example,
is in
because
is a divisor of
Find the sum of all the digits of all the numbers in
For example, the number
contributes
to this total.
Problem 5
Six cards numbered through
are to be lined up in a row. Find the number of arrangements of these six cards where one of the cards can be removed leaving the remaining five cards in either ascending or descending order.
Problem 6
A flat board has a circular hole with radius and a circular hole with radius
such that the distance between the centers of the two holes is
Two spheres with equal radii sit in the two holes such that the spheres are tangent to each other. The square of the radius of the spheres is
where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
Problem 7
A club consisting of men and
women needs to choose a committee from among its members so that the number of women on the committee is one more than the number of men on the committee. The committee could have as few as
member or as many as
members. Let
be the number of such committees that can be formed. Find the sum of the prime numbers that divide
Problem 8
A bug walks all day and sleeps all night. On the first day, it starts at point faces east, and walks a distance of
units due east. Each night the bug rotates
counterclockwise. Each day it walks in this new direction half as far as it walked the previous day. The bug gets arbitrarily close to the point
Then
where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
Problem 9
Let be the set of positive integer divisors of
Three numbers are chosen independently and at random with replacement from the set
and labeled
and
in the order they are chosen. The probability that both
divides
and
divides
is
where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
Problem 10
Let and
be positive integers satisfying the conditions
is a multiple of
and
is not a multiple of
Find the least possible value of
Problem 11
For integers and
let
and
Find the number of ordered triples
of integers with absolute values not exceeding
for which there is an integer
such that
Problem 12
Let be the least positive integer for which
is divisible by
Find the number of positive integer divisors of
Problem 13
Point lies on side
of
so that
bisects
The perpendicular bisector of
intersects the bisectors of
and
in points
and
respectively. Given that
and
the area of
can be written as
where
and
are relatively prime positive integers, and
is a positive integer not divisible by the square of any prime. Find
Problem 14
Let be a quadratic polynomial with complex coefficients whose
coefficient is
Suppose the equation
has four distinct solutions,
Find the sum of all possible values of
Problem 15
Let be an acute triangle with circumcircle
and let
be the intersection of the altitudes of
Suppose the tangent to the circumcircle of
at
intersects
at points
and
with
and
The area of
can be written as
where
and
are positive integers, and
is not divisible by the square of any prime. Find
If we set to
, we can find all other angles through these two properties: 1. Angles in a triangle sum to
. 2. The base angles of an isosceles triangle are congruent.
Now we angle chase. ,
,
,
,
,
. Since
as given by the problem,
, so
. Therefore,
, and our desired angle is
for an answer of
.
Solution 2
Let be
in degrees.
. By Exterior Angle Theorem on triangle
,
. By Exterior Angle Theorem on triangle
,
. This tells us
and
. Thus
and we want
to get an answer of
.
Solution 3 (Official MAA)
Let . Because
is isosceles,
. Then
Because
and
are also isosceles,
Because
is isosceles,
is also
, so
, and it follows that
. The requested sum is
.
2.Solution1
Since these form a geometric series, is the common ratio. Rewriting this, we get
by base change formula. Therefore, the common ratio is 2. Now
. Therefore,
.
Solution 2
If we set , we can obtain three terms of a geometric sequence through logarithm properties. The three terms are
In a three-term geometric sequence, the middle term squared is equal to the product of the other two terms, so we obtain the following:
which can be solved to reveal
. Therefore,
, so our answer is
.
Solution 3
Let be the common ratio. We have
Hence we obtain
Ideally we change everything to base
and we can get:
Now divide to get:
By change-of-base we obtain:
Hence
and we have
as desired.
~skyscraper
Solution 4 (Exponents > Logarithms)
Let be the common ratio, and let
be the starting term (
). We then have:
Rearranging these equations gives:
Deal with the last two equations first: Setting them equal gives:
Using LTE results in:
Using this value of
, substitute into the first and second equations (or the first and third, it doesn't really matter) to get:
Changing these to a common base gives:
Dividing the first equation by 2 on both sides yields:
Setting these equations equal to each other and applying LTE again gives:
Substituting this back into the first equation gives:
Therefore,
~IAmTheHazard
Solution 5
We can relate the logarithms as follows:
Now we can convert all logarithm bases to using the identity
:
We can solve for as follows:
We get
. Verifying that the common ratio is positive, we find the answer of
.
~QIDb602
Solution 6
If the numbers are in a geometric sequence, the middle term must be the geometric mean of the surrounding terms. We can rewrite the first two logarithmic expressions as and
, respectively. Therefore:
Let
. We can rewrite the expression as:
Zero does not work in this case, so we consider
:
. Therefore,
.
~Bowser498
Solution 7 (Official MAA)
By the Change of Base Formula the common ratio of the progression isHence
must satisfy
This is equivalent to
. Hence
and
. The requested sum is
.
3.Solution 1
From the given information, . Since
,
, and
have to be positive,
. Since we need to minimize the value of
, we want to minimize
, so we have
. Then we know
, and we can see the only solution is
,
. Finally,
, so our answer is
.
~ JHawk0224
Solution 2 (Official MAA)
The conditions of the problem imply that , so
. The maximum digit in base eight is
and because
, it must be that
is
or
When
, it follows that
, which implies that
. Then
must be
or
If
, then
is not an integer, and if
, then
, so
. Thus
, and
. The number
also satisfies the conditions of the problem, but
is the least such number.
4.Solution 1
We note that any number in can be expressed as
for some integer
. The problem requires that
divides this number, and since we know
divides
, we need that
divides 2020. Each number contributes the sum of the digits of
, as well as
. Since
can be prime factorized as
, it has
factors. So if we sum all the digits of all possible
values, and add
, we obtain the answer.
Now we list out all factors of , or all possible values of
.
. If we add up these digits, we get
, for a final answer of
.
-molocyxu
Solution 2 (Official MAA)
Suppose that has the required property. Then there are positive integers
and
such that
. Thus
, which holds exactly when
is a positive divisor of
The number
has
divisors:
, and
The requested sum is therefore the sum of the digits in these divisors plus
times the sum of the digits in
which is
5.Solution 1
Realize that any sequence that works (ascending) can be reversed for descending, so we can just take the amount of sequences that satisfy the ascending condition and multiply by two.
If we choose any of the numbers through
, there are five other spots to put them, so we get
. However, we overcount some cases. Take the example of
. We overcount this case because we can remove the
or the
. Therefore, any cases with two adjacent numbers swapped is overcounted, so we subtract
cases (namely,
,) to get
, but we have to add back one more for the original case,
. Therefore, there are
cases. Multiplying by
gives the desired answer,
.
-molocyxu
Solution 2 (Inspired by 2018 CMIMC combo round)
Similar to above, a correspondence between ascending and descending is established by subtracting each number from
.
We note that the given condition is equivalent to "cycling" for a contiguous subset of it. For example,
It's not hard to see that no overcount is possible, and that the cycle is either "right" or
"left." Therefore, we consider how many elements we flip by. If we flip
or
such elements, then there is one way to cycle them. Otherwise, we have
ways. Therefore, the total number of ascending is
, and multiplying by two gives
~awang11
Solution 3
Similarly to above, we find the number of ascending arrangements and multiply by 2.
We can choose cards to be the ascending cards, therefore leaving
places to place the remaining card. There are
to do this. However, since the problem is asking for the number of arrangements, we overcount cases such as
. Notice that the only arrangements that overcount are
(case 1) or if two adjacent numbers of
are switched (case 2).
This arrangement is counted
times. Each time it is counted for any of the
numbers selected. Therefore we need to subtract
cases of overcounting.
Each time
adjacent numbers of switched, there is one overcount. For example, if we have
, both
or
could be removed. Since there are
possible switches, we need to subtract
cases of overcounting.
Therefore, we have total arrangements of ascending numbers. We multiply by two (for descending) to get the answer of
-PCChess
Solution 4 (No overcounting)
Like in previous solutions, we will count the number of ascending arrangements and multiply by 2.
First, consider the arrangement 1-2-3-4-5-6. That gives us 1 arrangement which works.
Next, we can switch two adjacent cards. There are 5 ways to pick two adjacent cards, so this gives us 5 arrangements.
Now, we can "cycle" 3 adjacent cards. For example, 1-2-3 becomes 2-3-1 which becomes 3-1-2. There are 4 ways to pick a set of 3 adjacent cards, so this gives us 4x2=8 arrangements.
Cycling 4 adjacent cards, we get the new arrangements 2-3-4-1 (which works,) 3-4-1-2 (which doesn't work,) and 4-1-2-3 (which does work.) We get 6 arrangements.
Similarly, when cycling 5 cards, we find 2x2=4 arrangements, and when cycling 6 cards, we find 2x1=2 arrangements.
Adding, we figure out that there are 1+5+8+6+4+2=26 ascending arrangements. Multiplying by 2, we get the answer -i8Pie
Solution 5 (Official MAA 1)
First count the number of permutations of the cards such that if one card is removed, the remaining cards will be in ascending order. There is such permutation where all the cards appear in order:
There are
such permutations where two adjacent cards are interchanged, as in
The other such permutations arise from removing one card from
and placing it in a position at least two away from its starting location. There are
such positions to place each of the cards numbered
and
and
such positions for each of the cards numbered
and
This accounts for
permutations. Thus there are
permutations where one card can be removed so that the remaining cards are in ascending order. There is an equal number of permutations that result in the cards' being in descending order. This gives the total
.
Solution 6 (Official MAA 2)
More generally, suppose there are cards numbered
arranged in ascending order. If any one of the
cards is removed and placed in one of the
positions in the arrangement, the resulting permutation will have the property that one card can be removed so that the remaining cards are in ascending order. This accounts for
permutations. However, the original ascending order has been counted
times, and each order that arises by switching two neighboring cards has been counted twice. Hence the number of arrangements where one card can be removed resulting in the remaining cards' being in ascending order is
When
, this is
, and the final answer is
.
Solution 7 (Simple and Easy, don't know why it's hard)
For ascending you can place the in
locations and the rest of the numbers in
locations based on the sequence
.
. Multiply by
to account for the descending and get
. ~Lopkiloinm
6.Solution 1
Set the common radius to . First, take the cross section of the sphere sitting in the hole of radius 1. If we draw the perpendicular bisector of the chord (the hole) through the circle, this line goes through the center. Connect the center also to where the chord hits the circle, for a right triangle with hypotenuse
and base
. Therefore, the height of this circle outside of the hole is
.
The other circle follows similarly for a height (outside the hole) of . Now, if we take the cross section of the entire board, essentially making it 2-D, we can connect the centers of the two spheres, then form another right triangle with base
, as given by the problem. The height of this triangle is the difference between the heights of the parts of the two spheres outside the holes, which is
. Now we can set up an equation in terms of
with the Pythagorean theorem:
Simplifying a few times,
Therefore, our answer is
.
-molocyxu
Solution 2 (Official MAA)
Consider a cross section of the board and spheres with a plane that passes through the centers of the holes and centers of the spheres as shown.
Let ,
, and
be, respectively, the center of the hole with radius
the center of the sphere resting in that hole, and a point on the edge of that hole. Let
,
, and
be the corresponding points for the hole with radius
Let
be the point on
such that
. Let the radius of the spheres be
. Because
and
, it follows that
Because
,
, and
, it follows that
which simplifies to
. The requested sum is
. The value of
is approximately
7.Solution 1
Let be the number of women selected. Then, the number of men not selected is
. Note that the sum of the number of women selected and the number of men not selected is constant at
. Each combination of women selected and men not selected corresponds to a committee selection. Since choosing 12 individuals from the total of 23 would give
women and
men, the number of committee selections is
. The answer is
. ~awang11's sol
Solution 2 (Bash)
We casework on the amount of men on the committee.
If there are no men in the committee, there are ways to pick the women on the committee, for a total of
. Notice that
is equal to
, so the case where no men are picked can be grouped with the case where all men are picked. When all men are picked, all females must also be picked, for a total of
. Therefore, these cases can be combined to
Since
, and
, we can further simplify this to
All other cases proceed similarly. For example, the case with one men or ten men is equal to . Now, if we factor out a
, then all cases except the first two have a factor of
, so we can factor this out too to make our computation slightly easier. The first two cases (with
factored out) give
, and the rest gives
. Adding the
gives
. Now, we can test for prime factors. We know there is a factor of
, and the rest is
. We can also factor out a
, for
, and the rest is
. Adding up all the prime factors gives
.
Solution 3 (Vandermonde's identity)
Applying Vandermonde's identity by setting ,
, and
, we obtain
. ~Lcz
Short Proof
Consider the following setup:The dots to the left represent the men, and the dots to the right represent the women. Now, suppose we put a mark on
people (the
). Those to the left of the dashed line get to be "in" on the committee if they have a mark. Those on the right side of the dashed line are already on the committee, but if they're marked they get forcibly evicted from it. If there were
people marked on the left, there ends up being
people not marked on the right. Circles represent those in the committee.
We have our bijection, so the number of ways will be .
~programjames1
Solution 4
Notice that the committee can consist of boys and
girls. Summing over all possible
gives
Using the identity
, and Pascal's Identity
, we get
Using the identity
, this simplifies to
so the desired answer is
~ktong
Solution 5 (Official MAA)
Select any club members. That group will have
men and
women, so the number of women in the club not selected in that group is
. Thus, if the committee includes the men who were selected and the women who were not selected, the committee would have the correct number of men and women. Conversely, for every committee that could be formed with
men and
women, the men on this committee together with the women not on the committee comprise a subset of
club members. Thus
The requested sum is
8.Solution 1 (Coordinates)
We plot this on the coordinate grid with point as the origin. We will keep a tally of the x-coordinate and y-coordinate separately.
First move: The ant moves right . Second move: We use properties of a
triangle to get
right,
up. Third move:
left,
up. Fourth move:
left. Fifth move:
left,
down. Sixth move:
right,
down.
Total of x-coordinate: . Total of y-coordinate:
.
After this cycle of six moves, all moves repeat with a factor of . Using the formula for a geometric series, multiplying each sequence by
will give us the point
.
,
. Therefore, the coordinates of point
are
, so using the Pythagorean Theorem,
, for an answer of
.
-molocyxu
Solution 2 (Complex)
We place the ant at the origin of the complex plane with its first move being in the positive real direction. Then the ant's journey can be represented as the infinite seriesUsing the formula for an infinite geometric series, this is equal to
We are looking for the square of the modulus of this value:
so the answer is
.
Solution 3 (Solution 1 faster)
The ant goes in the opposite direction every moves, going
the distance backwards. Using geometric series, he travels
the distance of the first three moves over infinity moves. Now, we use coordinates meaning
or
. Multiplying these by
, we get
.
~Lcz
Solution 4 (Official MAA 1)
Suppose that the bug starts at the origin and travels a distance of
units due east on the first day, and that there is a real number
with
such that each day after the first, the bug walks
times as far as the previous day. On day
, the bug travels along the vector
that has magnitude
and direction
. Then
is the terminal point of the infinite sum of the vectors
. The
-coordinate of this sum is
Because the angles repeat after 6 terms, this sum is equal to
where
Similarly, the
-coordinate of
will be
, where
In this case
and
, so
and the coordinates of
are
Thus the square of the distance from the origin to
is
. The requested sum is
.
Solution 5 (Official MAA 2)
Let point be the origin in the complex plane. Point
is the complex sum
, where
. The distance squared is
9.Solution 1
First, prime factorize as
. Denote
as
,
as
, and
as
.
In order for to divide
, and for
to divide
,
, and
. We will consider each case separately. Note that the total amount of possibilities is
, as there are
choices for each factor.
We notice that if we add to
and
to
, then we can reach the stronger inequality
. Therefore, if we pick
integers from
to
, they will correspond to a unique solution, forming a 1-1 correspondence between the numbers
,
, and
. This is also equivalent to applying stars and bars on distributing the powers of 2 and 5 through differences. The amount of solutions to this inequality is
.
The case for ,
, and
proceeds similarly for a result of
. Therefore, the probability of choosing three such factors is
Simplification gives
, and therefore the answer is
.
-molocyxu
Solution 2
Same as before, say the factors have powers of and
.
can either be all distinct, all equal, or two of the three are equal. As well, we must have
. If they are all distinct, the number of cases is simply
. If they are all equal, there are only
cases for the general value. If we have a pair equal, then we have
. We need to multiply by
because if we have two values
, we can have either
or
.
Likewise for , we get
The final probability is simply . Simplification gives
, and therefore the answer is
.
Solution 3
Similar to before, we calculate that there are ways to choose
factors with replacement. Then, we figure out the number of triplets
and
, where
,
, and
represent powers of
and
,
, and
represent powers of
, such that the triplets are in non-descending order. The maximum power of
is
, and the maximum power of
is
. Using the Hockey Stick identity, we figure out that there are
ways to choose
,
and
, and
ways to choose
,
, and
. Therefore, the probability of choosing
factors which satisfy the conditions is
This simplifies to
, therefore
.
10.Solution 1
Taking inspiration from we are inspired to take
to be
, the lowest prime not dividing
, or
. Now, there are
factors of
, so
, and then
for
. Now,
. Noting
is the minimal that satisfies this, we get
. Thus, it is easy to verify this is minimal and we get
. ~awang11
Solution 2
Assume for the sake of contradiction that is a multiple of a single digit prime number, then
must also be a multiple of that single digit prime number to accommodate for
. However that means that
is divisible by that single digit prime number, which violates
, so contradiction.
is also not 1 because then
would be a multiple of it.
Thus, is a multiple of 11 and/or 13 and/or 17 and/or...
Assume for the sake of contradiction that has at most 1 power of 11, at most 1 power of 13...and so on... Then, for
to be satisfied,
must contain at least the same prime factors that
has. This tells us that for the primes where
has one power of,
also has at least one power, and since this holds true for all the primes of
,
. Contradiction.
Thus needs more than one power of some prime. The obvious smallest possible value of
now is
. Since
, we need
to be a multiple of 11 at least
that is not divisible by
and most importantly,
.
is divisible by
, out.
is divisible by 2, out.
is divisible by 5, out.
is divisible by 2, out.
and satisfies all the conditions in the given problem, and the next case
will give us at least
, so we get
.
11.Solution 1 (Strategic Casework)
Either or not. If it is, note that Vieta's forces
. Then,
can be anything. However,
can also be anything, as we can set the root of
(not equal to
) to any integer, producing a possible integer value of
. Therefore there are
in this case*. If it isn't, then
are the roots of
. This means by Vieta's, that:
Solving these inequalities while considering that to prevent
, we obtain
possible tuples and adding gives
. ~awang11
Solution 2 (Bash)
Define . Since
, we know
. Plugging in
into
, we get
. Setting
,
. Simplifying and cancelling terms,
Therefore, either or
. The first case is easy:
and there are
tuples in that case. In the second case, we simply perform casework on even values of
, to get
tuples, subtracting the
tuples in both cases we get
.
-EZmath2006
Notes For *
In case anyone is confused by this (as I initially was). In the case where , this does not mean that g has a double root of
, ONLY that
is one of the roots of g. So basically since
in this case,
, and we have
choices for b and we still can ensure c is an integer with absolute value less than or equal to 10 simply by having another integer root of g that when added to
ensures this, and of course an integer multiplied by an integer is an integer so
will still be an integer. In other words, you have can have
and
be any integer with absolute value less than or equal to 10 with
still being an integer. Now refer back to the 1st solution. ~First
12.Solution 1
Lifting the Exponent shows thatso thus,
divides
. It also shows that
so thus,
divides
.
Now, multiplying by
, we see
and since
and
then
meaning that we have that by LTE,
divides
.
Since ,
and
all divide
, the smallest value of
working is their LCM, also
. Thus the number of divisors is
.
~kevinmathz
Solution 2 (Simpler, just basic mods and Fermat's theorem)
Note that for all ,
is divisible by
because that is a factor. That is
, so now we can clearly see that the smallest
to make the expression divisible by
is just
. Similarly, we can reason that the smallest
to make the expression divisible by
is just
.
Finally, for , take
and
of each quantity (They happen to both be
and
respectively, so you only need to compute once). One knows from Fermat's theorem that the maximum possible minimum
for divisibility by
is
, and other values are factors of
. Testing all of them(just
,
,
using mods-not too bad),
is indeed the smallest value to make the expression divisible by
, and this clearly is NOT divisible by
. Therefore, the smallest
to make this expression divisible by
is
.
Calculating the LCM of all these, one gets . Using the factor counting formula, the answer is
=
.
~Solution by thanosaops
~formatted by MY-2
~also formatted by pandyhu2001
Solution 3 (Elementary and Thorough)
As usual, denote the highest power of prime
that divides
. For divisibility by
, notice that
as
, and upon checking mods,
is divisible by
but not
. In addition,
is divisible by
because
, and the rightmost factor equates to
. In fact,
is the least possible choice to ensure divisibility by
because if
, with
and
, we write
Then, the rightmost factor is equivalent to
, and
.
For divisibility by , we'll induct, claiming that
for whole numbers
. The base case is clear. Then,
By the induction hypothesis,
. Then, notice that
This tells us that
is divisible by
, but not
so that
, completing our induction. We can verify that
is the least choice of
to ensure divisibility by
by arguing similarly to the
case.
Finally, for , we take the powers of
and
in mod
and mod
. Writing out these mods, we have that
if and only if
, in which
. So here we claim that
and perform yet another induction. The base case is true:
, but
. Now then, assuming the induction statement to hold for some
,
Note that
equates to
in both mod
and mod
. We notice that
. Writing out the powers of
mod
, we have
. Also
when
is a multiple of
. Hence for
,
. Thus,
, completing our induction. Applying the same argument from the previous two cases,
is the least choice to ensure divisibility by
.
Our answer is the number of divisors of . It is
.
~hnkevin42
13.Solution 1
Points are defined as shown. It is pretty easy to show that by spiral similarity at
by some short angle chasing. Now, note that
is the altitude of
, as the altitude of
. We need to compare these altitudes in order to compare their areas. Note that Stewart's theorem implies that
, the altitude of
. Similarly, the altitude of
is the altitude of
, or
. However, it's not too hard to see that
, and therefore
. From here, we get that the area of
is
, by similarity. ~awang11
Solution 2(coord bash + basic geometry)
Let lie on the x-axis and
be the origin.
is
. Use Heron's formula to compute the area of triangle
. We have
. and
. We now find the altitude, which is
, which is the y-coordinate of
. We now find the x-coordinate of
, which satisfies
, which gives
since the triangle is acute. Now using the Angle Bisector Theorem, we have
and
to get
. The coordinates of D are
. Since we want the area of triangle
, we will find equations for perpendicular bisector of AD, and the other two angle bisectors. The perpendicular bisector is not too challenging: the midpoint of AD is
and the slope of AD is
. The slope of the perpendicular bisector is
. The equation is(in point slope form)
. The slope of AB, or in trig words, the tangent of
is
. Finding
and
. Plugging this in to half angle tangent, it gives
as the slope of the angle bisector, since it passes through
, the equation is
. Similarly, the equation for the angle bisector of
will be
. For
use the B-angle bisector and the perpendicular bisector of AD equations to intersect at
. For
use the C-angle bisector and the perpendicular bisector of AD equations to intersect at
. The area of AEF is equal to
since AD is the altitude of that triangle with EF as the base, with
being the height.
and
, so
which gives
. NEVER overlook coordinate bash in combination with beginner synthetic techniques.~vvluo
Solution 3 (Coordinate Bash + Trig)
Let and
be the line
. We compute that
, so
. Thus,
lies on the line
. The length of
at a point
is
, so
.
We now have the coordinates ,
and
. We also have
by the angle-bisector theorem and
by taking the midpoint. We have that because
,
by half angle formula.
We also compute , so
.
Now, has slope
, so it's perpendicular bisector has slope
and goes through
.
We find that this line has equation .
As , we have that line
has form
. Solving for the intersection point of these two lines, we get
and thus
We also have that because ,
has form
.
Intersecting the line and the perpendicular bisector of
yields
.
Solving this, we get and so
.
We now compute . We also have
.
As , we have
.
The desired answer is ~Imayormaynotknowcalculus
Solution 4 (Barycentric Coordinates)
As usual, we will use homogenized barycentric coordinates.
We have that will have form
. Similarly,
has form
and
has form
. Since
and
, we also have
. It remains to determine the equation of the line formed by the perpendicular bisector of
.
This can be found using EFFT. Let a point on
have coordinates
. We then have that the displacement vector
and that the displacement vector
has form
. Now, by EFFT, we have
. This equates to
.
Now, intersecting this with , we have
,
, and
. This yields
,
, and
, or
.
Similarly, intersecting this with , we have
,
, and
. Solving this, we obtain
,
, and
, or
.
We finish by invoking the Barycentric Distance Formula twice; our first displacement vector being . We then have
, thus
.
Our second displacement vector is . As a result,
, so
.
As , the desired area is
. ~Imayormaynotknowcalculus
Remark: The area of can also be computed using the Barycentric Area Formula, although it may increase the risk of computational errors; there are also many different ways to proceed once the coordinates are determined.
Solution 5 (geometry+trig)
To get the area of , we try to find
and
.
Since is the angle bisector, we can get that
and
. By applying Stewart's Theorem, we can get that
. Therefore
.
Since is the perpendicular bisector of
, we know that
. Since
is the angle bisector of
, we know that
. By applying the Law of Sines to
and
, we know that
. Since
is not equal to
and therefore these two triangles are not congruent, we know that
and
are supplementary. Then we know that
and
are also supplementary. Given that
, we can get that
is half of
. Similarly, we have
is half of
.
By applying the Law of Cosines, we get , and then
. Similarly, we can get
and
. Based on some trig identities, we can compute that
, and
.
Finally, the area of equals
. Therefore, the final answer is
. ~xamydad
Remark: I didn't figure out how to add segments ,
,
and
. Can someone please help add these segments?
(Added 🙂 ~Math_Genius_164)
Solution 6
First and foremost as
is the perpendicular bisector of
. Now note that quadrilateral
is cyclic, because
and
. Similarly quadrilateral
is cyclic,
Let
,
,
be the
,
, and
excenters of
respectively. Then it follows that
. By angle bisector theorem we have
. Now let the feet of the perpendiculars from
and
to
be
and
resptively. Then by tangents we have
From the previous ratios,
Similarly we can find that
and
and thus
-tkhalid
14.Solution 1
Either or not. We first see that if
it's easy to obtain by Vieta's that
. Now, take
and WLOG
. Now, consider the parabola formed by the graph of
. It has vertex
. Now, say that
. We note
. Now, we note
by plugging in again. Now, it's easy to find that
, yielding a value of
. Finally, we add
. ~awang11, charmander3333
Remark: We know that from
.
Solution 2
Let the roots of be
and
, then we can write
. The fact that
has solutions
implies that some combination of
of these are the solution to
, and the other
are the solution to
. It's fairly easy to see there are only
possible such groupings:
and
, or
and
(Note that
are interchangeable, and so are
and
). We now casework: If
, then
so this gives
. Next, if
, then
Subtracting the first part of the first equation from the first part of the second equation gives
Hence,
, and so
. Therefore, the solution is
~ktong
Solution 3
Write . Split the problem into two cases:
and
.
Case 1: We have . We must have
Rearrange and divide through by
to obtain
Now, note that
Now, rearrange to get
and thus
Substituting this into our equation for
yields
. Then, it is clear that
does not have a double root at
, so we must have
and
or vice versa. This gives
and
or vice versa, implying that
and
.
Case 2: We have . Then, we must have
. It is clear that
(we would otherwise get
implying
or vice versa), so
and
.
Thus, our final answer is . ~GeronimoStilton
Solution 4
Let . There are two cases: in the first case,
equals
(without loss of generality), and thus
. By Vieta's formulas
.
In the second case, say without loss of generality and
. Subtracting gives
, so
. From this, we have
.
Note , so by Vieta's, we have
. In this case,
.
The requested sum is .~TheUltimate123
15.Solution 1
The following is a power of a point solution to this menace of a problem:
Let points be what they appear as in the diagram below. Note that is not insignificant; from here, we set
by PoP and trivial construction. Now,
is the reflection of
over
. Note
, and therefore by Pythagorean theorem we have
. Consider
. We have that
, and therefore we are ready to PoP with respect to
. Setting
, we obtain
by PoP on
, and furthermore, we have
. Now, we get
, and from
we take
However, squaring and manipulating with
yields that
and from here, since
we get the area to be
. ~awang11's sol
Solution 1a
As in the diagram, let ray extended hits BC at L and the circumcircle at say
. By power of the point at H, we have
. The three values we are given tells us that
. L is the midpoint of
(see here: https://www.cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/AltitudeAndCircumcircle.shtml ), so
.
As in the diagram provided, let K be the intersection of and
. By power of a point on the circumcircle of triangle
,
. By power of a point on the circumcircle of triangle
,
, thus
. Solving gives
or
.
By the Pythagorean Theorem on triangle ,
. Now continue with solution 1.
Solution 2
Diagram not to scale.
We first observe that , the image of the reflection of
over line
, lies on circle
. This is because
. This is a well known lemma. The result of this observation is that circle
, the circumcircle of
is the image of circle
over line
, which in turn implies that
and thus
is a parallelogram. That
is a parallelogram implies that
is perpendicular to
, and thus divides segment
in two equal pieces,
and
, of length
.
Using Power of a Point,This means that
and
, where
is the foot of the altitude from
onto
. All that remains to be found is the length of segment
.
Looking at right triangle , we find that
Looking at right triangle
, we get the equation
Plugging in known values, and letting
be the radius of the circle, we find that
Recall that is a parallelogram, so
. So,
, where
is the midpoint of
. This means that
Thus, the area of triangle is
The answer is
.
翰林课程体验,退费流程快速投诉邮箱: yuxi@linstitute.net 沪ICP备2023009024号-1