答案解析请参考文末
How many positive perfect squares less than are multiples of 24?
A 100 foot long moving walkway moves at a constant rate of 6 feet per second. Al steps onto the start of the walkway and stands. Bob steps onto the start of the walkway two seconds later and strolls forward along the walkway at a constant rate of 4 feet per second. Two seconds after that, Cy reaches the start of the walkway and walks briskly forward beside the walkway at a constant rate of 8 feet per second. At a certain time, one of these three persons is exactly halfway between the other two. At that time, find the distance in feet between the start of the walkway and the middle person.
The complex number is equal to , where is a positive real number and . Given that the imaginary parts of and are the same, what is equal to?
Three planets orbit a star circularly in the same plane. Each moves in the same direction and moves at constant speed. Their periods are , , and years. The three planets and the star are currently collinear. What is the fewest number of years from now that they will all be collinear again?
The formula for converting a Fahrenheit temperature to the corresponding Celsius temperature is An integer Fahrenheit temperature is converted to Celsius, rounded to the nearest integer, converted back to Fahrenheit, and again rounded to the nearest integer.
For how many integer Fahrenheit temperatures between and inclusive does the original temperature equal the final temperature?
A frog is placed at the origin on the number line, and moves according to the following rule: in a given move, the frog advances to either the closest point with a greater integer coordinate that is a multiple of , or to the closest point with a greater integer coordinate that is a multiple of . A move sequence is a sequence of coordinates which correspond to valid moves, beginning with , and ending with . For example, is a move sequence. How many move sequences are possible for the frog?
Let
Find the remainder when is divided by 1000. ( is the greatest integer less than or equal to , and is the least integer greater than or equal to .)
The polynomial is cubic. What is the largest value of for which the polynomials and are both factors of ?
In right triangle with right angle , and . Its legs and are extended beyond and . Points and lie in the exterior of the triangle and are the centers of two circles with equal radii. The circle with center is tangent to the hypotenuse and to the extension of leg , the circle with center is tangent to the hypotenuse and to the extension of leg , and the circles are externally tangent to each other. The length of the radius of either circle can be expressed as , where and are relatively prime positive integers. Find .
In a grid ( rows, columns), of the squares are to be shaded so that there are two shaded squares in each row and three shaded squares in each column. Let be the number of shadings with this property. Find the remainder when is divided by .
For each positive integer , let denote the unique positive integer such that . For example, and . If find the remainder when is divided by 1000.
In isosceles triangle , is located at the origin and is located at (20,0). Point is in the first quadrant with and angle . If triangle is rotated counterclockwise about point until the image of lies on the positive -axis, the area of the region common to the original and the rotated triangle is in the form , where are integers. Find .
A square pyramid with base and vertex has eight edges of length 4. A plane passes through the midpoints of , , and . The plane's intersection with the pyramid has an area that can be expressed as . Find .
A sequence is defined over non-negative integral indexes in the following way: , .
Find the greatest integer that does not exceed
Let be an equilateral triangle, and let and be points on sides and , respectively, with and . Point lies on side such that angle . The area of triangle is . The two possible values of the length of side are , where and are rational, and is an integer not divisible by the square of a prime. Find .
Generalizing this, we define that . Thus, . We need to find all values that . Testing every value of shows that , so of every values of work.
There are cycles of , giving numbers that work. Of the remaining numbers from onwards, work, giving us as the solution.
Notice that holds if for some . Thus, after translating from we want count how many values of there are such that is an integer from to . This value is computed as , adding in the extra solution corresponding to .
Let be a degree Celsius, and rounded to the nearest integer. Since was rounded to the nearest integer we have , which is equivalent to if we multiply by . Therefore, it must round to because so is the closest integer. Therefore there is one solution per degree celcius in the range from to , meaning there are solutions.
Regrouping, work from
In total, we get .
In summary, we can draw the following tree, where in , represents the current position on the number line, and represents the number of paths to get there:
|
|
Again, this totals .
We divide it into 3 stages. The first occurs before the frog moves past 13. The second occurs before it moves past 26, and the last is everything else.
For the first stage the possible paths are , , , , , and . That is a total of 6.
For the second stage the possible paths are , , , , , and . That is a total of 6.
For the third stage the possible paths are , , , , and . That is a total of 5.
However, we cannot jump from (this eliminates 5 paths) or (this eliminates 6 paths), so we must subtract .
The answer is
Another way would be to use a table representing the number of ways to reach a certain number
How we came with each value is to just add in the number of ways that we can reach that number from previous numbers. For example, for , we can reach it from , so we add all those values to get the value for . For , it is only reachable from or , so we have .
The answer for can be computed in a similar way to get .
Use a similar solution to the aforementioned solution. Instead, call , and then proceed by simplifying through identities. We see that . In terms of , we find that . Similarly, we find that .
Substituting, we find that . Under a common denominator, . Trigonometric identities simplify this to . From here, it is possible to simplify:
Our answer is , and .
Let the point where CB's extension hits the circle be G, and the point where the hypotenuse hits that circle be E. Clearly . Let . Draw the two perpendicular radii to G and E. Now we have a cyclic quadrilateral. Let the radius be length . We see that since the cosine of angle ABC is the cosine of angle EBG is . Since the measure of the angle opposite to EBG is the complement of this one, its cosine is . Using the law of cosines, we see that This tells us that .
Now look at the other end of the hypotenuse. Call the point where CA hits the circle F and the point where the hypotenuse hits the circle D. Draw the radii to F and D and we have cyclic quadrilaterals once more. Using the law of cosines again, we find that the length of our tangents is . Note that if we connect the centers of the circles we have a rectangle with sidelengths 8x and 4x. So, . Solving we find that so our answer is 737.
By Pythagoras, . Let be the -excenter of triangle . Then the -exradius is given by .
The circle with center is tangent to both and , which means that lies on the external angle bisector of . Therefore, lies on . Similarly, lies on .
Let be the common radius of the circles with centers and . The distances from points and to are both , so is parallel to , which means that triangles and are similar.
The distance from to is , so the distance from to is . Therefore,
.
Hence, the final answer is .
Start with a scaled 16-30-34 triangle. Inscribe a circle. The height, and radius, are found via where is the perimeter.
Cut the figure through the circle and perpendicular to the hypotenuse. Slide the two pieces in opposite directions along the hypotenuse until they are one diameter of the circle apart. Complete the two partial circles.
The linear dimensions of the new triangle are times the size of the original. The problem's 16-30-34 triangle sits above the circles. Equate heights and solve for :
The answer is .
Using homothecy in the diagram above, as well as the auxiliary triangle, leads to the solution.
A different approach is to plot the triangle on the Cartesian Plane with at , at , and at . We wish to find the coordinates of and in terms of the radius, which will be expressed as in the rest of this solution. When we know the coordinates, we will set the distance between the 2 points equal to . All points units away from are on the line with slope , and y-intercept
will have x-coordinate and likewise will have y-coordinate plugging this into the equation for the line mentioned in the sentence above gives us:
and
By the distance formula and the fact that the circles and tangent, we have:
which simplifies into the quadratic equation:
And by the quadratic equation, the solutions are: The solution including the "" is extraneous so we have the radius equal to
Which simplifies to . The sum of the numerator and the denominator is
It is known that is parallel to AB. Thus, extending and to intersect at H yields similar triangles and BAC, so that , , and . It should be noted that . Also, FHGC is a rectangle, and so AF = and similarly for BG. Because tangents to a circle are equal, the hypotenuse can be expressed in terms of r:Thus, r = , and the answer is
So there are different shadings, and the solution is .
We start by showing that every group of rows can be grouped into complementary pairs. We proceed with proof by contradiction. Without loss of generality, assume that the first row has columns and shaded. Note how if there is no complement to this, then all the other five rows must have at least one square in the first two columns shaded. That means that in total, the first two rows have squares shaded in- that is false since it should only be . Thus, there exists another row that is complementary to the first. We remove those two and use a similar argument again to show that every group of rows can be grouped into complementary pairs.
Now we proceed with three cases.
Our answer is thus leaving us with a final answer of
We draw a bijection between walking from to as follows: if in the th row, the th and th columns are shaded, then the st step is in the direction corresponding to , and the th step is in the direction corresponding to () here. We can now use the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion based on the stipulation that to solve the problem:
So that the answer is .
There are to choose the arrangement of the shaded squares in each column. Examine the positioning of the shaded squares in the first two columns:
Thus, there are number of shadings, and the solution is .
Consider all possible shadings for a single row. There are ways to do so, and denote these as , , , , , and where indicates that columns and are shaded. From our condition on the columns, we have Summing the first two and the last two equations, we have , from which we have . Likewise, and since these pairs shade in complimentary columns. So the six rows are paired up into a row and its compliment. In all, we can have 3 a's and 3 b's and similar setups for / and /, 2 a's, 2 b's, 1 c and 1 d and similar setups for all six arrangements, or one of each. This first case gives solutions; the second gives solutions, and the final case gives solutions. In all, we have 1860 solutions, for an answer of .
Each shading can be brought, via row swapping operations, to a state with a shaded in the lower left hand corner. The number of such arrangements multiplied by will be the total. Consider rows 2 and 3 up from the bottom: they each have one of their allotted two squares shaded. Depending how the remaining three shades are distributed, the column totals of columns 2,3, and 4 from the left can be of the form . Form 1: The entire lower left rectangle is shaded, forcing the opposite rectangle to also be shaded; thus 1 arrangement Form 2: There is a column with nothing shaded in the bottom right , so it must be completely shaded in the upper right . Now consider the upper right half column that will have shade. There are ways of choosing this shade, and all else is determined from here; thus 3 arrangements Form 3: The upper right will have exactly shades per column and row. This is equivalent to the number of terms in a determinant, or arrangements
Of the ways of choosing to complete the bottom half of the , form 1 is achieved in exactly 1 way; form 2 is achieved in ways; and form in the remaining ways. Thus, the weighted total is . Complete:
Note that if we find a valid shading of the first 3 columns, the shading of the last column is determined. We also note that within the first 3 columns, there will be 3 rows with 1 shaded square and 3 rows with 2 shaded squares.
There are ways to choose which rows have 1 shaded square (which we'll call a "1-row") within the first 3 columns and which rows have 2 (we'll call these "2-rows") within the first 3 columns. Next, we do some casework:
In total, we have . Thus our answer is .
We can use generating functions. Suppose that the variables , , , and represent shading a square that appears in the first, second, third, or fourth columns, respectively. Then if two squares in the row are shaded, then the row is represented by the generating function , which we can write as . Therefore, represents all of the possible ways to color six rows such that each row has two shaded squares. We only want the possibilities when each column has three shaded squares, or rather, the coefficient of in .
By the Binomial Theorem,If we expand , then the powers of and are always equal. Therefore, to obtain terms of the form , the powers of and in must be equal. In particular, only the central term in the binomial expansion will contribute, and this implies that must be even. We can use the same logic for and . Therefore, the coefficient of in the following expression is the same as the coefficient of in (1).Now we notice that the only way to obtain terms of the form is if we take the central term in the binomial expansion of . Therefore, the terms that contribute to the coefficient of in (2) areThis sum is so the answer is .
Let the new triangle be (, the origin, is a vertex of both triangles). Let intersect with at point , intersect with at , and intersect with at . The region common to both triangles is the quadrilateral . Notice that , where we let denote area.
Thus is a . It can be solved by drawing an altitude splitting the angle into and angles, forming a right triangle and a isosceles right triangle. Since we know that , the base of the triangle is , the base of the is , and their common height is . Thus, the total area of .
To finish,Hence, .
Redefine the points in the same manner as the last time (, intersect at , , and ). This time, notice that .
The area of . The altitude of is clearly . The tangent addition rule yields (see above). Thus, .
The area of (with a side on the y-axis) can be found by splitting it into two triangles, and right triangles. . The sine subtraction rule shows that . , in terms of the height of , is equal to .
The area of was found in the previous solution to be .
Therefore, , and our answer is .
Call the points of the intersections of the triangles , , and as noted in the diagram (the points are different from those in the diagram for solution 1). bisects .
Through HL congruency, we can find that is congruent to . This divides the region (which we are trying to solve for) into two congruent triangles and an isosceles right triangle.
Now, we need to find . The acute angles of the triangles are and . By repeated application of the half-angle formula, we can find that .
The area of . Thus, , which eventually simplifies to .
Adding them together, we find that the solution is , and the answer is .
From the given information, calculate the coordinates of all the points (by finding the equations of the lines, equating). Then, use the shoelace method to calculate the area of the intersection.
Now, we can equate the equations to find the intersections of all the points.
We take these points and tie them together by shoelace, and the answer should come out to be .
Note first that the intersection is a pentagon.
Use 3D analytical geometry, setting the origin as the center of the square base and the pyramid’s points oriented as shown above. . Using the coordinates of the three points of intersection , it is possible to determine the equation of the plane. The equation of a plane resembles , and using the points we find that , , and . It is then .
Use the same coordinate system as above, and let the plane determined by intersect at and at . Then the line is the intersection of the planes determined by and .
Note that the plane determined by has the equation , and can be described by . It intersects the plane when , or . This intersection point has . Similarly, the intersection between and has . So lies on the plane , from which we obtain and . The area of the pentagon can be computed in the same way as above.
We are given that
, .
Add these two equations to get
This is an invariant. Defining for each , the above equation means
.
We can thus calculate that . Using the equation and dividing both sides by , notice that . This means that
. It is only a tiny bit less because all the are greater than , so we conclude that the floor of is .
The equation looks like the determinantTherefore, the determinant of this matrix is invariant. Guessing that this sequence might be a linear recursion because of the matrix form given below, we define the sequence defined by and for . We wish to find and such that for all . To do this, we use the following matrix form of a linear recurrence relation
When we take determinants, this equation becomes
We wantfor all . Therefore, we replace the two matrices by to find that
Therefore, . Computing that , and using the fact that , we conclude that . Clearly, , , and . We claim that for all . We proceed by induction. If for all , then clearly,We also know by the definition of that
We know that the RHS is by previous work. Therefore, . After substuting in the values we know, this becomes . Thinking of this as a linear equation in the variable , we already know that this has the solution . Therefore, by induction, for all . We conclude that satisfies the linear recurrence .
It's easy to prove that is a strictly increasing sequence of integers for . Now
The sequence certainly grows fast enough such that . Therefore, the largest integer less than or equal to this value is .
This is a more elementary and rigorous solution to a slightly generalized version. The defining recursive sequence is generalized to
where is a positive integer and
Lemma 1 : For ,We shall prove by induction. From (1), . From the lemma, Base case proven. Assume that the lemma is true for some . Then, eliminating the using (1) and (2) gives
It follows from (2) that
where the last line followed from (1) for case .
Lemma 2 : For Base case is obvious. Assume that for some . Then it follows that
This completes the induction.
Lemma 3 : For
Using (1) and Lemma 2, for
Finally, using (3), for Using lemma 3, the largest integer less than or equal to this value would be .
We will try to manipulate to get .
Using the recurrence relation, Applying the relation to ,
We can keep on using this method to get that
This telescopes to
or
Finding the first few values, we notice that they increase rapidly, so . Calculating the other values, .
The greatest number that does not exceed this is
Use the quadratic formula, though we only need the root of the discriminant. This is . The answer is .
以上解析方式仅供参考
学术活动报名扫码了解!免费领取历年真题!
© 2024. All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备2023009024号-1