完整版真题免费下载
+答案解析请参考文末
Let ,
,
be real numbers greater than or equal to
. Prove that
Let be a non-equilateral, acute triangle with
, and let
and
denote the circumcenter and orthocenter of
, respectively.
(a) Prove that line intersects both segments
and
.
(b) Line intersects segments
and
at
and
, respectively. Denote by
and
the respective areas of triangle
and quadrilateral
. Determine the range of possible values for
.
Let be the set of integers. Find all functions
such that
for all
with
.
Let be an integer, and let
denote the sum of the digits of
when it is written in base
. Show that there are infinitely many positive integers that cannot be represented in the form
, where
is a positive integer.
Let be a positive integer. Two players
and
play a game on an infinite grid of regular hexagons. Initially all the grid cells are empty. Then the players alternately take turns with
moving first. In his move,
may choose two adjacent hexagons in the grid which are empty and place a counter in both of them. In his move,
may choose any counter on the board and remove it. If at any time there are
consecutive grid cells in a line all of which contain a counter,
wins. Find the minimum value of
for which
cannot win in a finite number of moves, or prove that no such minimum value exists.
Let be a triangle with incenter
, incircle
and circumcircle
. Let
be the midpoints of sides
,
,
and let
be the tangency points of
with
and
, respectively. Let
be the intersections of line
with line
and line
, respectively, and let
be the midpoint of arc
of
.
(a) Prove that lies on ray
.
(b) Prove that line bisects
.
Since ,
or
Since
,
Also note that
, We conclude
Similarly,
So
or
Therefore,
Lemma: is the reflection of
over the angle bisector of
(henceforth 'the' reflection)
Proof: Let be the reflection of
, and let
be the reflection of
.
Then reflection takes to
.
is equilateral, and
lies on the perpendicular bisector of
It's well known that lies strictly inside
(since it's acute), meaning that
from which it follows that
. Similarly,
. Since
lies on two altitudes,
is the orthocenter, as desired.
So is perpendicular to the angle bisector of
, which is the same line as the angle bisector of
, meaning that
is equilateral.
Let its side length be , and let
, where
because
lies strictly within
, as must
, the reflection of
. Also, it's easy to show that if
in a general triangle, it's equilateral, and we know
is not equilateral. Hence H is not on the bisector of
. Let
intersect
at
.
Since and
are 30-60-90 triangles,
Similarly,
The ratio is
The denominator equals
where
can equal any value in
except
. Therefore, the denominator can equal any value in
, and the ratio is any value in
Note: It's easy to show that for any point on
except the midpoint, Points B and C can be validly defined to make an acute, non-equilateral triangle.
Let be the farthest point on the circumcircle of
from line
. Lemma: Line
||Line
Proof: Set
and
, and
on the unit circle. It is well known that
and
, so we have
, so
is real and thus the 2 lines are parallel.
WLOG let be in the first quadrant. Clearly by the above lemma
must intersect line
closer to
than to
. Intersect
and
at
and
and
at
. We clearly have
,
must intersect
. We also have, letting the intersection of line
and line
be
, and letting intersection of
and
be
,
. Since
, and
,
also intersects
. We have
, so
is equilateral. Letting
, and letting the foot of the perpendicular from
to
be
, we have
, and since
is an altitude of
, we have
. Letting the foot of the perpendicular from
to
be
, we have
by AA with ratio
. Therefore,
. Letting
be the foot of the altitude from
to
, we have
, since
. Thus, since
we have
, so
, so
. We have
, with
, so
can be anything in the interval
. Therefore, the desired range is
.
Let's assume Substitute
to get
This means that is a perfect square. However, this is impossible, as it is equivalent to
Therefore,
Now substitute
to get
Similarly,
From these two equations, we can find either
or
Both of these are valid solutions on their own, so let's see if there are any solutions combining the two.
Let's say we can find and
Then
(NEEDS FIXING:
, so the RHS is
instead of
.)
If then
which is only possible when
This contradicts our assumption. Therefore,
This forces
due to the right side of the equation. Let's consider the possibility
Substituting
into the original equation yields
which is impossible. So
and there are no solutions "combining"
and
Therefore our only solutions are and
Define , and call a number unrepresentable if it cannot equal
for a positive integer
. We claim that in the interval
there exists an unrepresentable number, for every positive integer
.
If is unrepresentable, we're done. Otherwise, time for our lemma:
Lemma: Define the function to equal the number of integers x less than
such that
. If
for some y, then
.
Proof: Let be the set of integers x less than
such that
. Then for every integer in
, append the digit
to the front of it to create a valid integer in
. Also, notice that
. Removing the digit
from the front of y creates a number that is not in
. Hence,
, but there exists an element of
not corresponding with
, so
.
Note that our lemma combined with the Pigeonhole Principle essentially proves the claim. Therefore, because there are infinitely many intervals containing an unrepresentable number, there are infinitely many unrepresentable numbers.
I hope this solution is quite intuitive, because it is without complicated notation. It didn't take me very long to discover. As with Solution 1, define . We will use numbers from
to
for induction. Call this interval Class
.
Start with and go up to
. There are
numbers covered. Easily
ranges from
to
, or a range of
. Thus, there are at LEAST
numbers lacking coverage. Now, in order to fill up these gaps, we consult Class
:
to
. If we are to fill up all these gaps, then we need at least
numbers in the next series with their
values. Unfortunately, there are only at MOST
numbers that can satisfy a value, from
to
, otherwise the
value is too big (note that none of them are zero)! Thus, between Class 0 and 1, there is at least one value lacking.
After setting up the base case, consider the Class numbers from
to
there are clearly
integers. Yet the
can range from
to
. This gives a range of
. This leaves an extra
numbers. Now, we invoke the next class:
. Again, to fill in the gap there are sadly only
numbers available:
to
, because
is at least 1.
By induction we are done. Because each Class for integral
at least
misses at least one
value, we miss an infinite number of numbers. Game over!
Note: If you are unconvinced of the range of values we go from the smallest value of both the number and the
, or
and
, to the greatest of both, i.e.
and
, because in that series the largest possible sum is a bunch of
s.
The answer is . We prove that
can win for
(which hence proves it for
as well) and show that
can thwart
for
.
Arrange the board so that a pair of opposite sides are horizontal. Create a coordinate system on the board by setting the center of some hexagon as the origin and setting the hexagons directly above and above-and-right as and
, respectively. Then, for example, the below-and-right hexagon touching the origin is
. So two hexagons touch if their coordinate difference is one of these.
Now for , person
places his counters only in
. Note that if, at
's turn, there are 4 counters in either column, then
can win immediately, so let us assume that in both columns there are at least 2 missing, meaning that at most
counters are on the board. We would like to find when
cannot play under these circumstances. If we look at the disjoint sets
we see that either some set has at least hexagons without counters, in which case
can move, or all four sets have exactly
missing counter. Similarly for the sets
So both have no token on them. This means that
do. Thus
and
do not. So this is the only situation in which
can neither win immediately nor play in only these 10 hexagons.
So plays only in these 10 hexagons until either he has a win or he can't anymore. If he wins, then we're done. Otherwise,
plays in hexagons
and
. Then
either removes
so that
can win at
, or
removes
and
plays at
and
and then at either
or
the next turn, or
removes one of
in which case
can either win immediately at
or can play in both columns, and then win the next turn.
Now if , then if
plays on anything in the lattice generated by
and
, that is
for
integers, then
removes it. Otherwise,
removes any of
's counters. This works because in order for
to win, there must be at least 2 counters in this lattice, but
can only put a counter on
at any time, so there's at most 1 on the lattice at any time.
So wins if
, and
wins if
.
(a)
Solution 1: We will prove this via contradiction: assume that line intersects line
at
and line
and
, with
and
not equal to
. Let
and
. We know that
because
is a midsegment of triangle
; thus, by alternate interior angles (A.I.A)
, because triangle
is isosceles. Also by A.I.A,
. Furthermore, because
is an angle bisector of triangle
, it is also an altitude of the triangle; combining this with
from the Exterior Angle Theorem gives
. Also,
because they are vertical angles. This completes part (a).
Solution 2: First we show that the intersection of
with the internal angle bisector of
is the same as the intersection
of
with the internal angle bisector of
Let
denote the intersection of
with the internal angle bisector of
and let
denote the side lengths of
By Menelaus on
with respect to
Similarly,
Since
and
divide
in the same ratio, they must be the same point. Now, since
lies on ray
(b)
Solution 1: Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line . Because
, triangle
is isosceles. Similarly, triangle
is isosceles, from which we derive that
. Hence, triangle
is isosceles.
Note that lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment
. Let
be the midpoint of
; our goal is to prove that points
,
, and
are collinear, which equates to proving
lies on ray
.
Because is also an altitude of triangle
, and
and
are both perpendicular to
,
. Furthermore, we have
because
is a parallelogram. (incomplete)
Solution 2: Let ,
, and
be the excenters of
. Note that the circumcircle of
is the nine-point circle of
. Since
is the external angle bisector of
,
is the midpoint of
. Now
and
are parallel since both are perpendicular to the internal angle bisector of
. Since
bisects
, it bisects
as well.
Solution 3: Let be the antipode of
with respect to the circumcircle of triangle
. Then, by the Incenter-Excenter lemma,
is the center of a circle containing
,
, and
. Because
is a diameter,
and
are tangent to the aforementioned circle; thus by a well-known symmedian lemma,
coincides with the
-symmedian of triangle
. From part (a); we know that
is cyclic (we can derive a similar argument for point
); thus
coincides with the median of triangle
, and we are done.
翰林课程体验,退费流程快速投诉邮箱: yuxi@linstitute.net 沪ICP备2023009024号-1