完整版真题免费下载
+答案解析请参考文末
Let , , be real numbers greater than or equal to . Prove that
Let be a non-equilateral, acute triangle with , and let and denote the circumcenter and orthocenter of , respectively.
(a) Prove that line intersects both segments and .
(b) Line intersects segments and at and , respectively. Denote by and the respective areas of triangle and quadrilateral . Determine the range of possible values for .
Let be the set of integers. Find all functions such thatfor all with .
Let be an integer, and let denote the sum of the digits of when it is written in base . Show that there are infinitely many positive integers that cannot be represented in the form , where is a positive integer.
Let be a positive integer. Two players and play a game on an infinite grid of regular hexagons. Initially all the grid cells are empty. Then the players alternately take turns with moving first. In his move, may choose two adjacent hexagons in the grid which are empty and place a counter in both of them. In his move, may choose any counter on the board and remove it. If at any time there are consecutive grid cells in a line all of which contain a counter, wins. Find the minimum value of for which cannot win in a finite number of moves, or prove that no such minimum value exists.
Let be a triangle with incenter , incircle and circumcircle . Let be the midpoints of sides , , and let be the tangency points of with and , respectively. Let be the intersections of line with line and line , respectively, and let be the midpoint of arc of .
(a) Prove that lies on ray .
(b) Prove that line bisects .
Since ,orSince ,Also note that , We concludeSimilarly,SoorTherefore,
Lemma: is the reflection of over the angle bisector of (henceforth 'the' reflection)
Proof: Let be the reflection of , and let be the reflection of .
Then reflection takes to .
is equilateral, and lies on the perpendicular bisector of
It's well known that lies strictly inside (since it's acute), meaning that from which it follows that . Similarly, . Since lies on two altitudes, is the orthocenter, as desired.
So is perpendicular to the angle bisector of , which is the same line as the angle bisector of , meaning that is equilateral.
Let its side length be , and let , where because lies strictly within , as must , the reflection of . Also, it's easy to show that if in a general triangle, it's equilateral, and we know is not equilateral. Hence H is not on the bisector of . Let intersect at .
Since and are 30-60-90 triangles,
Similarly,
The ratio is The denominator equals where can equal any value in except . Therefore, the denominator can equal any value in , and the ratio is any value in
Note: It's easy to show that for any point on except the midpoint, Points B and C can be validly defined to make an acute, non-equilateral triangle.
Let be the farthest point on the circumcircle of from line . Lemma: Line ||Line Proof: Set and , and on the unit circle. It is well known that and , so we have , so is real and thus the 2 lines are parallel.
WLOG let be in the first quadrant. Clearly by the above lemma must intersect line closer to than to . Intersect and at and and at . We clearly have , must intersect . We also have, letting the intersection of line and line be , and letting intersection of and be , . Since , and , also intersects . We have , so is equilateral. Letting , and letting the foot of the perpendicular from to be , we have , and since is an altitude of , we have . Letting the foot of the perpendicular from to be , we have by AA with ratio . Therefore, . Letting be the foot of the altitude from to , we have , since . Thus, since we have , so , so . We have , with , so can be anything in the interval . Therefore, the desired range is .
Let's assume Substitute to get
This means that is a perfect square. However, this is impossible, as it is equivalent to Therefore, Now substitute to getSimilarly,From these two equations, we can find either or Both of these are valid solutions on their own, so let's see if there are any solutions combining the two.
Let's say we can find and Then(NEEDS FIXING: , so the RHS is instead of .)
If then which is only possible when This contradicts our assumption. Therefore, This forces due to the right side of the equation. Let's consider the possibility Substituting into the original equation yieldswhich is impossible. So and there are no solutions "combining" and
Therefore our only solutions are and
Define , and call a number unrepresentable if it cannot equal for a positive integer . We claim that in the interval there exists an unrepresentable number, for every positive integer .
If is unrepresentable, we're done. Otherwise, time for our lemma:
Lemma: Define the function to equal the number of integers x less than such that . If for some y, then .
Proof: Let be the set of integers x less than such that . Then for every integer in , append the digit to the front of it to create a valid integer in . Also, notice that . Removing the digit from the front of y creates a number that is not in . Hence, , but there exists an element of not corresponding with , so .
Note that our lemma combined with the Pigeonhole Principle essentially proves the claim. Therefore, because there are infinitely many intervals containing an unrepresentable number, there are infinitely many unrepresentable numbers.
I hope this solution is quite intuitive, because it is without complicated notation. It didn't take me very long to discover. As with Solution 1, define . We will use numbers from to for induction. Call this interval Class .
Start with and go up to . There are numbers covered. Easily ranges from to , or a range of . Thus, there are at LEAST numbers lacking coverage. Now, in order to fill up these gaps, we consult Class : to . If we are to fill up all these gaps, then we need at least numbers in the next series with their values. Unfortunately, there are only at MOST numbers that can satisfy a value, from to , otherwise the value is too big (note that none of them are zero)! Thus, between Class 0 and 1, there is at least one value lacking.
After setting up the base case, consider the Class numbers from to there are clearly integers. Yet the can range from to . This gives a range of . This leaves an extra numbers. Now, we invoke the next class: . Again, to fill in the gap there are sadly only numbers available: to , because is at least 1.
By induction we are done. Because each Class for integral at least misses at least one value, we miss an infinite number of numbers. Game over!
Note: If you are unconvinced of the range of values we go from the smallest value of both the number and the , or and , to the greatest of both, i.e. and , because in that series the largest possible sum is a bunch of s.
The answer is . We prove that can win for (which hence proves it for as well) and show that can thwart for .
Arrange the board so that a pair of opposite sides are horizontal. Create a coordinate system on the board by setting the center of some hexagon as the origin and setting the hexagons directly above and above-and-right as and , respectively. Then, for example, the below-and-right hexagon touching the origin is . So two hexagons touch if their coordinate difference is one of these.
Now for , person places his counters only in . Note that if, at 's turn, there are 4 counters in either column, then can win immediately, so let us assume that in both columns there are at least 2 missing, meaning that at most counters are on the board. We would like to find when cannot play under these circumstances. If we look at the disjoint sets
we see that either some set has at least hexagons without counters, in which case can move, or all four sets have exactly missing counter. Similarly for the sets
So both have no token on them. This means that do. Thus and do not. So this is the only situation in which can neither win immediately nor play in only these 10 hexagons.
So plays only in these 10 hexagons until either he has a win or he can't anymore. If he wins, then we're done. Otherwise, plays in hexagons and . Then either removes so that can win at , or removes and plays at and and then at either or the next turn, or removes one of in which case can either win immediately at or can play in both columns, and then win the next turn.
Now if , then if plays on anything in the lattice generated by and , that is for integers, then removes it. Otherwise, removes any of 's counters. This works because in order for to win, there must be at least 2 counters in this lattice, but can only put a counter on at any time, so there's at most 1 on the lattice at any time.
So wins if , and wins if .
(a)
Solution 1: We will prove this via contradiction: assume that line intersects line at and line and , with and not equal to . Let and . We know that because is a midsegment of triangle ; thus, by alternate interior angles (A.I.A) , because triangle is isosceles. Also by A.I.A, . Furthermore, because is an angle bisector of triangle , it is also an altitude of the triangle; combining this with from the Exterior Angle Theorem gives . Also, because they are vertical angles. This completes part (a).
Solution 2: First we show that the intersection of with the internal angle bisector of is the same as the intersection of with the internal angle bisector of Let denote the intersection of with the internal angle bisector of and let denote the side lengths of By Menelaus on with respect to Similarly,Since and divide in the same ratio, they must be the same point. Now, since lies on ray
(b)
Solution 1: Using a similar argument to part (a), point U lies on line . Because , triangle is isosceles. Similarly, triangle is isosceles, from which we derive that . Hence, triangle is isosceles.
Note that lies on both the circumcircle and the perpendicular bisector of segment . Let be the midpoint of ; our goal is to prove that points , , and are collinear, which equates to proving lies on ray .
Because is also an altitude of triangle , and and are both perpendicular to , . Furthermore, we have because is a parallelogram. (incomplete)
Solution 2: Let , , and be the excenters of . Note that the circumcircle of is the nine-point circle of . Since is the external angle bisector of , is the midpoint of . Now and are parallel since both are perpendicular to the internal angle bisector of . Since bisects , it bisects as well.
Solution 3: Let be the antipode of with respect to the circumcircle of triangle . Then, by the Incenter-Excenter lemma, is the center of a circle containing , , and . Because is a diameter, and are tangent to the aforementioned circle; thus by a well-known symmedian lemma, coincides with the -symmedian of triangle . From part (a); we know that is cyclic (we can derive a similar argument for point ); thus coincides with the median of triangle , and we are done.
© 2024. All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备2023009024号-1