完整版真题免费下载
+答案解析请参考文末
Note: For any geometry problem whose statement begins with an asterisk (), the first page of the solution must be a large, in-scale, clearly labeled diagram. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an automatic 1-point deduction.
Prove that there are infinitely many distinct pairs of relatively prime positive integers
and
such that
is divisible by
Consider the equation
(a) Prove that there are infinitely many pairs of positive integers satisfying the equation.
(b) Describe all pairs of positive integers satisfying the equation.
() Let
be an equilateral triangle and let
be a point on its circumcircle. Let lines
and
intersect at
; let lines
and
intersect at
; and let lines
and
intersect at
. Prove that the area of triangle
is twice the area of triangle
.
Note: For any geometry problem whose statement begins with an asterisk (), the first page of the solution must be a large, in-scale, clearly labeled diagram. Failure to meet this requirement will result in an automatic 1-point deduction.
Are there any triples of positive integers such that
is a prime that properly divides the positive number
?
() Let
and
be the circumcenter and the orthocenter of an acute triangle
. Points
and
lie on side
such that
and
. Ray
intersects the circumcircle of triangle
in point
. Prove that
.
Let be
distinct points on the unit circle
other than
. Each point is colored either red or blue, with exactly
of them red and exactly
of them blue. Let
be any ordering of the red points. Let
be the nearest blue point to
traveling counterclockwise around the circle starting from
. Then let
be the nearest of the remaining blue points to
traveling counterclockwise around the circle from
, and so on, until we have labeled all the blue points
. Show that the number of counterclockwise arcs of the form
that contain the point
is independent of the way we chose the ordering
of the red points.
Let and
. We see that
. Therefore, we have
, as desired.
Let be odd where
. We have
so
This means that
and since x is odd,
or
as desired.
Because problems such as this usually are related to expressions along the lines of , it's tempting to try these. After a few cases, we see that
is convenient due to the repeated occurrence of
when squared and added. We rewrite the given expressions as:
After repeatedly factoring the initial equation,we can get:
Expanding each of the squares, we can compute each product independently then sum them:
Now we place the values back into the expression:
Plugging any positive integer value for
into
yields a valid solution, because there is an infinite number of positive integers, there is an infinite number of distinct pairs
.
We have , which can be expressed as
. At this point, we
think of substitution. A substitution of form is slightly derailed by the leftover x and y terms, so
instead, seeing the xy in front, we substitute . This leaves us with
, so
. Expanding yields
. Rearranging, we have
. To satisfy this equation in integers,
must obviously be a
power, and further inspection shows
that it must also be odd. Also, since it is a square and all odd squares are 1 mod 8, every odd sixth power gives a
solution. Since the problem asks for positive integers, the pair does not work. We go to the next highest odd
power,
or
. In this case,
, so the LHS is
, so
. Using the original
substitution yields as the first solution. We have shown part a by showing that there are an infinite
number of positive integer solutions for , which can then be manipulated into solutions for
. To solve part
b, we look back at the original method of generating solutions. Define and
to be the pair representing the nth
solution. Since the nth odd number is ,
. It follows that
. From our original substitution,
.
First, we shall prove a lemma:
LEMMA:
PROOF: Expanding and simplifying the right side, we find that
which proves our lemma.
Now, we have thatRearranging and getting rid of the denominator, we have that
Factoring, we have
Dividing both sides, we have
Now, since the LHS is the 6th power of a rational number, and the RHS is an integer, the RHS must be a perfect 6th power. Define
. By inspection,
must be a positive odd integer satistisfying
. We also have
Now, we can solve for
and
in terms of
:
and
. Now we have:
and it is trivial to check that this parameterization works for all such
(to keep
and
integral), which implies part (a).
MOTIVATION FOR LEMMA: I expanded the LHS, noticed the coefficients were , and immediately thought of binomial coefficients. Looking at Pascal's triangle, it was then easy to find and prove the lemma.
-sunfishho
So named because it is a mix of solutions 1 and 2 but differs in other aspects. After fruitless searching, let ,
. Clearly
. Then
.
Change the LHS to . Change the RHS to
. Therefore
. Let
, and note that
is an integer. Therefore
. Because
,
is odd and
because
. Therefore, substituting for
and
we get:
.
WLOG, let . Let
, and
. After some angle chasing, we find that
and
. Therefore,
~
.
Lemma 1: If , then
. This lemma results directly from the fact that
~
;
, or
.
Lemma 2: . We see that
, as desired.
Lemma 3: . We see that
However, after some angle chasing and by the Law of Sines in
, we have
, or
, which implies the result.
By the area lemma, we have and
.
We see that . Thus, it suffices to show that
, or
. Rearranging, we find this to be equivalent to
, which is Lemma 3, so the result has been proven.
We will use barycentric coordinates and vectors. Let be the position vector of a point
The point
in barycentric coordinates denotes the point
For all points in the plane of
we have
It is clear that
;
; and
Define the point as
The fact that
lies on the circumcircle of
gives us
This, along with the condition
inherent to barycentric coordinates, gives us
We can write the equations of the following lines:
We can then solve for the points :
The area of an arbitrary triangle is:
To calculate we wish to compute
After a lot of computation, we obtain the following:
Evaluating the denominator,
Since and
it follows that:
We thus conclude that:
From this, it follows that and we are done.
We'll use coordinates and shoelace. Let the origin be the midpoint of
. Let
, and
, then
. Using the facts
and
, we have
, so
, and
.
The slope of is
It is well-known that
is self-polar, so
is the polar of
, i.e.,
is perpendicular to
. Therefore, the slope of
is
. Since
, we get the x-coordinate of
,
, i.e.,
. Using shoelace,
So
. Q.E.D
Yes. Let . Also define
. We want
to divide the positive number
. This equality can be verified by expanding the righthand side. Because
will be trivially positive if
is non-negative, we can just assume that
. Analyzing the structure of
, we see that
,
, and
must be
or
mod
, or
will not be prime (divisibility by
and
). Thus, we can guess any
,
, and
which satisfies those constraints. For example,
,
, and
works.
is prime, and it divides the positive number
.
This solution is wrong. No actually exist.
Suppose ray intersects the circumcircle of
at
, and let the foot of the A-altitude of
be
. Note that
. Likewise,
. So,
.
is cyclic, so
. Also,
. These two angles are on different circles and have the same measure, but they point to the same line
! Hence, the two circles must be congruent. (This is also a well-known result)
We know, since is the midpoint of
, that
is perpendicular to
.
is also perpendicular to
, so the two lines are parallel.
is a transversal, so
. We wish to prove that
, which is equivalent to
being cyclic.
Now, assume that ray intersects the circumcircle of
at a point
. Point
must be the midpoint of
. Also, since
is an angle bisector, it must also hit the circle at the point
. The two circles are congruent, which implies
NDP is isosceles. Angle ADN is an exterior angle, so
. Assume WLOG that
. So,
. In addition,
. Combining these two equations,
.
Opposite angles sum to , so quadrilateral
is cyclic, and the condition is proved.
I define a sequence to be, starting at and tracing the circle counterclockwise, and writing the color of the points in that order - either R or B. For example, possible sequences include
,
,
,
, etc. Note that choosing an
is equivalent to choosing an
in a sequence, and
is defined as the
closest to
when moving rightwards. If no
s exist to the right of
, start from the far left. For example, if I have the above example
, and I define the 2nd
to be
, then the first
will be
. Because no
or
can be named twice, I can simply remove
and
from my sequence when I choose them. I define this to be a move. Hence, a possible move sequence of
is:
Note that, if, in a move, appears to the left of
, then
intersects
Now, I define a commencing to be a
which appears to the left of all
s, and a terminating
to be a
which appears to the right of all
s. Let the amount of commencing
s be
, and the amount of terminating
s be
, I claim that the number of arcs which cross
is constant, and it is equal to
. I will show this with induction.
Base case is when . In this case, there are only two possible sequences -
and
. In the first case,
does not cross
, but both
and
are
, so
. In the second example,
,
, so
.
crosses
since
appears to the left of
, so there is one arc which intersects. Hence, the base case is proved.
For the inductive step, suppose that for a positive number , the number of arcs which cross
is constant, and given by
for any configuration. Now, I will show it for
.
Suppose I first choose such that
is to the right of
in the sequence. This implies that
does not cross
. But, neither
nor
is a commencing
or terminating
. These numbers remain constant, and now after this move we have a sequence of length
. Hence, by assumption, the total amount of arcs is
.
Now suppose that appears to the right of
, but
is not a commencing
. This implies that there are no commencing
s in the series, because there are no
s to the left of
, so
. Note that this arc does intersect
, and
must be a terminating
.
must be a terminating
because there are no
s to the right of
, or else that
would be
. The
length sequence that remains has
commencing
s and
terminating
s. Hence, by assumption, the total amount of arcs is
.
Finally, suppose that appears to the right of
, and
is a commencing
. We know that this arc will cross
. Analogous to the previous case,
is a terminating
, so the
length sequence which remains has
commencing
s and
terminating
s. Hence, by assumption, the total amount of arcs is
.
There are no more possible cases, hence the induction is complete, and the number of arcs which intersect is indeed a constant which is given by
.
翰林课程体验,退费流程快速投诉邮箱: yuxi@linstitute.net 沪ICP备2023009024号-1