首次落地中国内地!
IEO国际经济学奥赛平替!
EAC亚州经济学大会2025
报名启动!等你来战!
经济er快冲!
EAC亚州经济学大会2025
EAC-亚洲经济学大会(Economics AsiaConvention),由IEO日本组委-金融知力普及协会、IEO中国澳门组委-礼仕培育基金,及IEO中国区创始、成功举办前四届IEOC活动的ITCCC联手,联合东京大学、香港大学等权威学术单位专家共同发起,这是一场专属于亚太区域的高水平经济学活动,是向对经济学与商科满怀激情的中学生发出的荣耀召集令!
首届EAC国际站已于2024年3月在日本成功举办,来自中国香港、澳门,以及日本、阿联酋、泰国、新加坡等多个国家和地区的IEO精英代表与高中财经商界新星,齐聚东京,完成了一场为期7天的智慧碰撞与文化交融之旅。
2025年,EAC将首次落地中国内地,为所有对经济学、商科、金融充满热情的中学生提供一个展示自我、挑战自我的舞台!
1、适合学生
🔹 经济学基础较强,对经济学、商学、金融学具有兴趣浓厚的12年级及以下中学生。
🔹要求学生掌握高于AP、A-Level和IBDP等国际课程中经济学和商学(商管)学科知识体系的内容,特别是对于AP体系的同学,需要在完成AP微观经济学和AP宏观经济学之后,补充学习学术大纲中提出的额外知识部分。
2、赛事时间
🔹报名截止日期:2024年12月1日
🔹水平测试时间:2024年12月22日🔹中国站测评时间:2025年2月7日—2月10日🔹国际站测评时间:20205年3月23日—3月29日
中国站表现优异挑战者将获邀参加国际站测评,现场跨国、跨区域组建全新战队。
3、赛事形式
🔹报名方式:4人团队为单位(报名截止日期前应完成组队且全员成功报名缴费;不足 4 人团队,将自动转为个人形式)
🔹评估方式:线上,经济学知识测评(Economics),个人为单位,150分钟
🔹赛事语言:英文答题
4、评估方式
5、考察内容
中国站2025和全球站2025都考察经济学进阶知识测评(Economics)和商业项目路演(Business Case)
经济学进阶知识测评(Economics)考察范围:
🔹 Basic knowledge of economics
🔹 Microeconomics
🔹Macroeconomics (including global economy and evelopment economy)
🔹 Financial literary
商业项目路演(Business Case)考察范围
🔹Business environment analysis
🔹Marketing
🔹Finance and accounting
🔹Human resources
🔹Operation
🔹Presentation skills
这两项考察内容涵盖的细分内容较多,因篇幅原因暂不展示,完整考察内容可扫描下方二维码添加顾问老师咨询!
我要咨询/报名
EAC亚州经济学大会2025各阶段测试项目说明
EAC亚州经济学大会2025主要分为三个阶段:
1、在线水平测试2025
🔹挑战形式:个人为单位,90分钟限时在线答题。
🔹题目类型:客观选择题(Multiple Choice Questions),30道,每题4分,答错或未作答不扣分,满分120分;答题时不可以使用计算器和任何辅助工具。
🔹知识点占比:经济学知识70%,商业知识15%,金融知识(个人理财)15%。
🔹活动细则:关于在线水平测试详细说明,详见【学生指南任务卡2.3-活动细则】
2、中国站2025
中国站测试主要包括经济学进阶知识测评和商业项目路演:
经济学进阶知识测评(Economics)
🔹挑战形式:个人为单位, 150分钟限时纸笔答题,满分 200 分
🔹题目类型:
(1)客观选择题(Multiple Choice Question):20道,每题4分,答错倒扣1分,不回答不得分也不扣分,满分80分;
(2)问答题 (Open Questions):4道,选做3题(4选3),每题40分,满分120分;
注意:答题方式为笔答,答题时不可以使用计算器和任何辅助工具。
商业项目路演(Business Case)
🔹挑战形式:4 人团队为单位,满分 200 分。
🔹挑战环节:
(1)方案设计:10小时限时方案设计,制作、提交一份演示文稿(PDF)
(2)展示答辩:10分钟演讲展示+10分钟评委问答
🔹关注素养:
商业知识(包括并不限于市场预测、营销分析、财务分析、运营分析和人力资源分析),以及演讲能力(包括并不限于辩论能力、逻辑分析能力和应变能力和英文表达能力)。
学生应该通过系统的商业知识学习,获得基本的商业分析知识和工具,并能够在商业项目路演挑战中展示出自己的商业知识和能力。评委会将商业知识的掌握和运用能力作为评价的主要依据。
3、国际站 2025
经济学进阶知识测评(Economics)
🔹挑战形式:个人为单位, 180分钟限时纸笔答题。
🔹题目类型:
(1)客观选择题(Multiple Choice Question):20道,每题4分,答错倒扣1分,不回答不得分也不扣分,满分80分;
(2)问答题 (Open Questions):5道,选做4题(5选4)。
商业项目路演(Business Case)
🔹挑战形式:跨国、跨区域5人团队为单位。
🔹跳转环节:
(1)方案设计:48小时限时方案设计,制作、提交一份演示文稿(PDF)
(2)展示答辩:10分钟演讲展示+10分钟评委问答
EAC亚州经济学大会2025样题
1、EAC CHINA样题
部分EAC CHINA样题
1. Which of the following statement is correct?
A. When comparing with taxes levied on the quantity of pollutants emitted by firms, the obvious advantages of pollution permits is that no monitoring of firm’s emission is required.
B. When this is no externalities, a nationalized firm set output to maximise social welfare by making average revenue equals to marginal cost.
C. An age-related pension is included in the measurement of national income.
D. An increase in the total earnings will make it possible for the increase in real national output to increase in labor productivity.
Answer: B
A is wrong because the obvious advantages of pollution permit is that the reduction level is more predictable.
C is wrong because age-related pension is not included in the measurement of national income.
D is wrong because an increase in the total earnings will not necessarily make it possible for the increase in real national output to increase in labor productivity.
2. In an economy, the condition of pareto efficiency is realized. What does not necessarily follow from this?
A. The income distribution in the society is socially acceptable.
B. The economy is operating at a point on its production possibility frontier.
C. The conditions for allocative efficiency have been met.
D. The conditions for productive efficiency have been met.
Answer:A
B is wrong because the condition of pareto efficiency requires the operation on PPF.
C is wrong because the condition of pareto efficiency requires the allocative efficiency.
D is wrong because the condition of pareto efficiency requires the allocative efficiency.
3. What would be classified by economists as an increase in transfer payments?
A. The continuous more salary paid to the social workers because of covid-19.
B. Additional spending on public sector infrastructure
C. Extra spending for the aged-related pension
D. Transferring the spending from education to national defense
Answer: C
A is wrong because it is not transfer payment.
B is wrong because it is not transfer payment.
D is wrong because it is not transfer payment.
4. Which of following is a positive statement?
A. The U.S. government should increase income tax on high earners.
B. The U.S economic growth rate 4.5% less than that of China in 2015.
C. Economic growth in China was better than that of U.S.A.
D. Wages of those on low incomes ought to be increased.
Answer: B
A is wrong because it is normative statement.
C is wrong because it is normative statement.
D is wrong because it is normative statement.
5. Two players are negotiating where to place some object on Cartesian plane. They choose the coordinates (x, y) in the following way: player A sets the coordinate on the X-axis, player B sets the coordinate on the Y-axis. Player A wants the object to be as close as possible to the point (2, 4); player B wants the object to be as close as possible to the point (3, 1). Find the Nash equilibrium location of the object.
A. (3, 4)
B. (2.5, 2.5)
C. (2, 1)
D. (0,0)
Answer: C
To meet the requirement of both players, the Nash equilibrium should be on (2, 1) from the four possible answers.
6. Given the demand function Q= 700-2P+0.02Y, where P is the price and P=25, Y is the income and Y=5000, the price elasticity of demand and income elasticity of demand is ___.
A. -0.067, 0.133
B. 0.067, 0.133
C. 0.133, -0.067
D. 0.133, 0.067
Answer: A
PED(Ed)= -2* (25/750)= -0.067
YED(Ei)= 0.02* (5000/750) =0.133
7. The Sveriges Riksbank prize in economic science in memory of Alfred Nobel 2021was divided, one half awarded to David Card, ___
A. for his empirical contributions to labor economics
B. for his methodological contribution to labor economics
C. for his practical contributions to labor economics
D. for his positive contributions to labor economics
Answer: A
The 2021 Nobel economic sciences winters are David Card for his empirical contributions to labor economics and Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens for their methodological contributions to the analysis of causal relationship.
8. Tom works 48 hours per week when the wage rate is $10 per hour. When the wage rate is increased to $15 per hour, Tom works 40 hours per week.
What explains the change in the number of hours worked?
A. There is no income effect
B. An income effect reinforcing a substitution effect
C. There is a negative income elasticity of demand for leisure
D. The income effect offsetting a substitution effect
Answer: D
A is wrong because there is income effect
B is wrong because the income effect offsetting a substitution effect
C is wrong because it is not related to income elasticity of demand
9. The table shows the consumer price index (CPI) for an economy expressed as an number
Year
CPI
2018
2019
2020
2021
100
104
101
96
Which does government most likely to take to stabilize the price level?
A. Increase the money supply
B. Increase the interest rate
C. Decrease the budget deficit
D. Revaluate the exchange rate
Answer: A
It seems that the inflation rate tends to decrease and economy is going into recession, it might be better for government to increase the money supply and lower the interest rate to stimulate the economy and make the economy come back to normal price level.
10. What of the following about concentration ratio is correct?
A. The higher the concentration ratio, the higher degree of competition.
B. Concentration ratio not only reflects the concentration in a national market, but also reflects competition from abroad.
C. A three-firm concentration ratio of 90% could consist of three firms with 30% of the market each, or of three firms, one of which has 60% of the market and the other two have 15% each. In the above analysis, a three-firm concentration ratio helps distinguish between different sizes of the firm.
D. The Herfindal index is important for assessing oligopolistic industries.
Answer: D
D is correct.
A is wrong because the higher the concentration ratio, the lower degree of competition.
B is wrong because although concentration ratio reflects the concentration in a national market, they do not reflect competition from abroad.
C is wrong because a three-firm concentration ratio doesn’t help distinguish between different sizes of the firm.
2、EAC国际站真题
翰林凭借多年的国际赛事经验,不仅能够为学生提供专业的学术指导,还能够帮助他们在各种竞赛中取得优异成绩。我们的团队由资深的教育专家和经验丰富的教练组成,熟悉各类国际赛事的规则和要求。
了解更多EAC亚州经济学大会2025活动信息和学术指导,可扫描下方二维码添加顾问老师咨询。
我要咨询EAC!
本期福利
EAC CHINA 2025样题
扫码领取!
翰林经济商赛阵容(部分)
翰林经济白老师
霍特国际商学院旧金山分校社会企业创业硕士
IEO-2023
●决赛执教队伍成为2023年IEO全国赛亚军,Business Case Overall Top 2。
●执教学员在经济学测评个人排名中分获全国第1和第4,个人总分排名分获第2和第5。
IEO-2022
●执教队伍成为2022年IEO中国国家代表队。
●决赛执教19名学员,7人获High Distinction,1人获Distinction,3人获Merit。2支队伍获High Distinction,2支队伍获 Distinction。1支队伍获Business Case Overall TOP 3,1支队伍获Business Case TOP 1 in Review Room。
NEC-2023
● 2023年NEC全球站执教7只队伍(5AS,2DR),其中AS团队总分获得第一、第三、第九名。QT微观、宏观单项分获全球第一、第八。CT单项两支队伍并列全球第一、其余队伍分获第五、第八。国际经济与时事单项分获全球第二、第六。DR团队总分数第二,DR组别CT获全球第十二。
NEC-2022
●全球站5只队伍(3AS,2DR),其中AS组全球总分第三、第八、案例大剖析全球第一,AS一名学员微观经济学获个人满分。AS组别宏观单项分获全球第六、第十。AS组别时事单项获全球第五、第九。DR队伍总分获全球第七。DR组别案例大剖析单项获全球第一。DR组别宏观单项获全球第八。DR组别微观单项获全球第五。
翰林经济/商赛杨老师
加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学全奖经济学硕士
SIC 2022-2023:
● 2023年SIC S9执教的三支队伍成功晋级全球赛 (三支队伍分别获得金奖、银奖及铜奖;晋级率100%);
●2022年SIC S8执教的队伍初级站以金奖晋级全球战,并在全球战以四金一银单项成绩,获得全球赛团队总分金奖。
NEC 2022-2023:
●2022-2023年NEC全国站执教的1支队伍 (AS组) 成功晋级全球总决赛; 1人获得宏观经济满分名人堂 (DR组);1人获得国际经济满分名人堂 (DR-Smart组) ;1支队伍获得全国案例大剖析金奖 (DR组)
●NEC区域站执教的4支队伍进入全国赛;其中1人获得AS组个人金奖,1人获个人微观优胜奖,3人获得个人银奖,2人获得个人铜奖
IEO2022:
● 2022年执教队伍获得IEO全国总决赛商业路演冠军
●2022年IEO区域站执教的3支团队均以High Distinction (top 10%) 晋级IEO全国决赛,其中8人获得个人High Distinction (top 10%),2人获得个人Distinction (top 30%)
翰林经济姜老师
约克大学舒立克商学院商务分析硕士
● 2023年NEC比赛中带领2位同学和4支NEC初赛带队1支PRO和3支DR进入中国决赛,1位学员进入全球赛。
● 2023年IEO一位同学进入全国赛。
● 2022年NEC比赛中带领3支nec初赛带队2支DR和1支AS队伍进入中国决赛。
● 2022年IEO全国站执教1支队伍,获得Merit。
●2022年IEO区域站执教9名学员,5人获得High Distinction (top 10%),2人获得Distinction (top 10% - 30%)
●2021年带出2名IEO个人专业组金奖。
翰林经济/商赛王老师
英国伦敦国王学院金融会计硕士
2018-2023 战绩
● FBLA 目前所带队伍均进入全球决赛
● NEC 2023: 6支队伍晋级中国赛,一组 AS一组/DR组学生进入全球赛
● NEC 2022: 5支队伍晋级中国赛,获得中国区决赛金奖/银奖若干;DR组学生荣获全球站总分第一名,个人总分第一名
● IEO 2020/2021 5/6支队伍晋级中国赛,获得中国区金银铜奖若干
● SIC 2020/2022所带队伍均获得全国团队总分奖及投资杰出团队奖并进入全球决赛
● John Locke 2021学生获得经济组第三名
翰林经济刘老师
加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学MBA
加拿大多伦多大学金融经济学士
●高中起留学工作北美多年,多年金融机构投资经验,FRM(金融风险管理)持证人。
● 曾就职于大型投行和公募基金;参与多个一级市场发行项目,管理数百亿人民币的基金组合。熟悉一级市场融资流程,二级市场投资分析框架和交易策略。也曾以合伙人身份参与金融科技行业的创业公司,负责公司的商业模式搭建及融资。
● 擅长科目为经济学及商业投资竞赛。教学中注重知识点结合财经时事和实际案例的运用,激发学生对于经济学科和投资创业的兴趣。
● 授课体系及科目:AP宏观及微观经济/A-level经济/ IGCSE经济,SIC,沃顿商赛。
● 执教成绩:学生AP五分率80%, Alevel 及IG A/A*率85%。
翰林经济赛事精英榜